The Marketing Rules I Have Completely Changed My Mind On

I followed all of these at some point. Some of them for longer than I would like to admit. Here is what I actually think now about marketing rules that don't work.

By Molly · The Molly Edit · Marketing Strategy

There is a particular kind of discomfort that comes with realising you have been confidently wrong about something.

Not just slightly off. Actually, genuinely, embarrassingly wrong. The kind of wrong where you can trace back specific decisions you made, advice you gave, strategies you followed, all rooted in a belief that turned out to be far less solid than it felt at the time.

Marketing is full of these moments. The industry moves fast, the evidence shifts, and the conventional wisdom that felt unassailable five years ago starts to look a lot more fragile in the light of what has happened since.

I have been working in marketing long enough to have accumulated a list of things I used to believe that I no longer do. Some of them I changed my mind on slowly. Some changed overnight when something I witnessed made the old belief impossible to keep holding.

This post is that list. Honest, direct, and slightly uncomfortable to write. Which probably means it is worth reading.

I used to think more content meant more growth

For a long time I believed, genuinely and completely, that the answer to almost every marketing challenge was more. More posts. More platforms. More frequency. More volume.

The logic seemed sound. More content means more chances to be seen. More chances to be seen means more followers. More followers means more business.

The reality is considerably more complicated than that.

What I have watched happen again and again, in my own work and in the work of people I have advised, is that more content without more clarity just produces more noise. You can post every single day for a year and see almost no meaningful growth if the content itself is not specific enough, honest enough, or valuable enough to make someone stop and actually care.

The accounts that grew the fastest were almost never the ones posting the most. They were the ones that had figured out something worth saying and said it in a way that landed. One genuinely great piece of content every week will outperform seven mediocre ones every time. I know this now. I wish I had known it earlier.

I used to think you needed to be on every platform

Related to the above, and equally wrong.

There was a period where I would have told you, with complete confidence, that a serious personal brand needed to be everywhere. Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, a podcast, a newsletter, a blog, a YouTube channel. Presence across all of it was the mark of someone who was really building something.

What I actually watched happen was people burning out spectacularly trying to maintain six channels simultaneously, producing mediocre content on all of them, and building meaningful traction on none of them.

The brands I have seen grow most consistently and most sustainably are almost always the ones that chose one or two platforms, learned them properly, and committed to them long enough for the work to compound. The multi-platform approach sounds ambitious. In practice it is usually just expensive fragmentation.

Pick your platform. Own it. Everything else can wait.

I used to think professionalism meant keeping yourself out of it

This one is perhaps the belief I held most strongly and have since changed my mind on most completely.

I was trained in an era of marketing where the personal was separate from the professional. You built a brand, not a person. You communicated benefits and features and credentials. You kept a certain distance because distance signaled authority and authority signaled trust.

And then everything changed.

What I have watched happen over the last several years is a fundamental shift in what audiences actually trust. They do not trust polished. They do not trust corporate. They do not trust the carefully managed, the perfectly produced, the version of a brand that feels like it has been through seven rounds of legal approval before it reaches them.

They trust real. They trust specific. They trust the person behind the brand who shows up as an actual human being with actual opinions and an actual story.

The brands that are winning right now, both personal brands and company brands, are the ones that have figured out how to be both professional and personal at the same time. Not oversharing. Not performing vulnerability for engagement. Just being genuinely human in a space that used to reward the opposite.

Keeping yourself out of your marketing is not professionalism anymore. It is a missed opportunity.

I used to think the goal was to go viral

I cringe slightly writing this one because I think somewhere deep down I knew it was not quite right, and I believed it anyway because the evidence of a viral moment is so immediate and so intoxicating that it is very easy to mistake it for the thing you are actually trying to build.

Going viral gets you attention. For a short time, an unpredictable amount of attention, from an unpredictable mix of people, most of whom will never engage with you again.

What going viral almost never does is build a brand. The brands that last, the ones that actually generate consistent business results and genuine audience loyalty, are built through consistency over time. Through showing up with something worth reading or watching or thinking about, week after week, for long enough that trust accumulates.

I have watched people have genuinely viral moments and be in exactly the same position six months later. And I have watched people with no viral moments build audiences that convert at rates those viral peaks never came close to, simply by being consistently good for long enough.

The goal is not to go viral. The goal is to become someone people seek out. Those are very different things and they require very different strategies.

I used to think data was everything

I am a marketer. I believe in data. I am not about to tell you to ignore your analytics or make decisions without evidence.

But I used to believe that data was the whole story. That if you measured everything and optimised everything and let the numbers lead every decision, you would end up in the right place. That gut instinct and creative judgment were the soft, unscientific cousins of proper marketing thinking and should be treated accordingly.

What I have come to believe instead is that data tells you what happened. It does not always tell you why. And it almost never tells you what to do next.

Some of the most effective pieces of marketing I have seen created, including things I have created myself, defied the data entirely. They broke the format that was performing well. They went longer when shorter was working. They got more personal when professional was generating the better numbers. And they worked because the person creating them trusted something beyond the spreadsheet.

Data is a tool. A very good tool. But it is not a substitute for judgment, and I spent too long treating it like one.

I used to think consistency meant sameness

When people talk about brand consistency, they usually mean visual consistency. Same colours, same fonts, same logo placement. And that matters, genuinely, it is not nothing.

But I used to conflate consistency of appearance with consistency of voice and consistency of values, and treat all three as if they meant the same thing: produce content that looks and sounds and feels as similar as possible from one piece to the next.

What I understand now is that consistency and sameness are not the same thing at all.

The best brands evolve constantly. They experiment with new formats. They shift their tone as they grow. They respond to what is happening in the world and in their industry. They are not the same brand they were two years ago and they should not be.

What stays consistent is the substance underneath all of that. The values. The point of view. The fundamental thing they stand for. That is the thread that makes an evolving brand feel coherent rather than chaotic.

Consistency is not about never changing. It is about never losing the thread of who you are while you change. I got those things confused for longer than I should have.

I used to think marketing and sales were separate things

The last one on this list and possibly the most practically important.

In the early part of my career I understood marketing and sales as distinct disciplines with distinct roles. Marketing built awareness and brand equity. Sales converted. The two handed off to each other at a certain point in the customer journey and then operated independently.

What I believe now is that the most effective marketing is also doing the work of sales, and the most effective sales is also doing the work of marketing, and the cleaner you try to draw the line between them the more you lose in the gap.

The personal brand that builds genuine trust through honest, specific, consistently valuable content is doing sales work every single time it publishes. The salesperson who shows up as a knowledgeable, generous, genuinely helpful person rather than someone with a quota to hit is doing marketing work in every conversation.

The brands that have figured this out, that have stopped treating awareness and conversion as separate problems with separate solutions, are the ones that feel effortless from the outside. The content does not feel like marketing. The sales process does not feel like being sold to. It all just feels like a relationship with someone worth trusting.

That is the goal. And it requires letting go of the idea that marketing stops where sales begins.

Changing your mind about things you used to believe is not weakness. It is the whole point of paying attention.

The marketing landscape shifts constantly. The evidence evolves. The audiences change. The platforms change. The things that worked five years ago work differently now, or do not work at all, or work in ways nobody anticipated.

The marketers I most respect are not the ones who have never been wrong. They are the ones who were wrong, noticed, updated their thinking, and kept going with more clarity than they had before.

I am still updating. I expect I always will be.

Want to build a marketing and personal brand strategy that is built on what actually works right now? The Molly Edit Course is coming soon. Join the waitlist and be first through the door.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Molly is a marketing strategist, brand consultant and PR professional based in Dubai. She helps founders, creatives and ambitious professionals build personal brands that feel unmistakably theirs. The Molly Edit is her platform for everything personal branding, marketing strategy and Dubai life.